Thursday, March 26, 2009

Old Memories ...

Today morning, when I was flipping channels while watching the match, I stopped at a vaguely familiar scene. A guy was standing in a river, face not clear - with Yesudass singing in the background. It took me a couple of seconds before I could recognize the aalaapanai - It was the song "kamalam paadha kamalam" from the movie moga mull. I love this song - brilliant rendition by Yesudass, pleasing but not too great lyrics, and amazing composition by IR. In fact, I like every song from this album (Sollayo vaai thirandhu, nenjey gurunatharin). The movie as such is a bore - but at least would have done justice to the novel by T.Janakiraman. This was one of those IR's carnatic-based classics,  and has prompted me to download songs from this movie and also from the movie Shankarabaranam.

This incident rekindled a lot of old memories and thoughts. When I was a kid I used to be surprised that most of the English movies that I saw, didn't have any songs as such. In the middle of the movie, no one used to jump out and sing a song. (I hadn't seen many musicals when I was a kid, I still haven't seen many!) After a point, I used to wonder, why people don't sing a song, say, when they are sad, in real life! Pondering about it now, I know very few movies in Tamil film industry that are devoid of songs. 

In fact, one of the biggest criticisms of tamil movies and other Indian movies, as well, is that, songs in a movie make it unrealistic - so why then do people use it? To me, the answer is very simple. Why should movies be realistic in the first place? All that matters is logical consistency, and not realism. Making a film is an art and it is upto the director to convey his thoughts on a film reel. Just like an artist who is allowed to use any colour to express his feelings, the director can choose any form of expression. Songs are exceptionally good at conveying emotions and are very powerful forms of expression in the sense they can stick to your mind better than, say, a dialogue. Of course, what I am against is the current trend where songs are placed in the movie just for the heck of it and nobody cares a rat's ass as to what it conveys. 

This prompted me to think of movies which would have been otherwise unknown if not for the music. I guess the same could be said of most of the movies of the mid-eighties and early nineties. So many movies would have been a huge flop had it not been for IR or Rahman. Actors like (mike)Mohan, (G)Ramarajan, would have gone into oblivion, but for IR! Will people even remember movies like Mr. Romeo, Kaadhalan, Kaadhal Desam if not for Rahman?!

I guess this one random post where I have started writing thinking of one thing and ended on a completely different note. A good, fruitful waste of a morning! ;-)

7 comments:

  1. "After a point, I used to wonder, why people don't sing a song, say, when they are sad, in real life!"

    I sing when i am sad... when i am happy.. when i am angry...!!!

    The effect of Indian Movies...!!!! ;)

    But i dont get the fact how can songs make movies unrealistic... I m not telling this as a music composer... It does not and i totally agree with you... Think of JANA GANA MANA from AYUDHA EZHUTHU... brilliant way to motivate...

    Actually it is very much not just me who sing according to my mood...

    CONGRESS - JAI HO (Slum DOG millionaire) - Election Campign...

    And lastly i wasted few minutes from my stupid hectic work commenting on this... ;)

    a good fruitful waste of evening.... :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very true! Music is such an integral part of our films, I can't imagine how firangs watch movie after movie after movie with NO songs at all!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @ karthik: What I meant was - when people are sad, they don't go sing a song extempore - they either hum other movie songs like me, or go and sit and compose a new song like you. So singing a song out of the blue is not realistic. But the point I'm trying to make is that, a movie need not be realistic - just like how a Mona Lisa is not realistic. But I agree with you on that music is an essential and a beautiful part of Indian movies.

    @ sush: I guess it wouldn't suit their movies. Our culture is more colourful and hence songs don't look very out of place. Just imagine a scene in the Titanic, where suddenly Jack and Rose jump out of the ship and dance for song in the Swiss alps - would be weird at the very least! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. well along the same lines,as a kid i used to wonder 1. how ppl on tv/movies come up with novel songs.. like noone sings a known song. :)everyone makes up their own tune, lyrics and just sings it!
    2. How every hero / heroine has a pleasant voice! no heroine has a normal voice.. and theres no hero who doesn't know how to sing or fight or dance.
    Like you said it doesnt have to be realistic for it to be a movie. Its just that for educated lay audience , it s more relatable/appealing when it is realistic. When the hero doesnt know to sing, you kinda feel slightly happy that you are not the only one :). When the hero gets badly beaten up by the villains, you kinda aravanaichufy him. (unless the hero is rajni or vijay ,and unless u r a hardcore fan,in which case the hero cannot get beaten up and the hero should get the heroine ,noone else should.)Watch Villu if you dont get what I mean :)
    I also used to think how come the heroine is the most important member of her friends gang. why cant the hero fall in love with one of the extras tht act as the heroine's thozhi s?

    So I guess these are the frills that differentiate realistic movies from filmy movies.But hey when it comes to entertainment , who cares!

    ReplyDelete
  5. And i really think comparing English movies with ours is a really bad idea. :). Two different worlds. For one ,English movies are just one and half hours long, heck they dont have time for silly songs. If you want songs, watch a musical!

    ReplyDelete
  6. not one of your best posts sri - yet, you touch upon an important thing. why songs, why in movies? why not in real life? not my position right now to answer any of these. for humans, emotional outbursts take several forms - i guess singing is one of them.

    On the other hand, it is not songs that make the movie unrealistic - it is the lack of coherence during the shift from a scene to a song that makes it often jarring. I guess that is the director's job :)

    anyways - keep blogging :)

    cheers,
    k

    ReplyDelete
  7. @ Divya : I agree with most of what you had to say, but just wanted to elaborate one point. I do not know if I come under the category of people who try to relate themselves to the movie. Probably that is why I don't want a realistic movie. Let me explain. A movie like Autograph or Onbadhu roobaai noattu maybe extremely realistic in the sense that what they have captured is something that could happen in anyone's life. The central character in the movie, is a typical next-door type guy, whose life story could probably be yours too. It is perfectly okay for people to like such movies. I am just saying that, when I go for a movie, I don't want to see a realistic this-could-happen-to-me movie. I want a director to say something in a movie. Don't misunderstand me - I don't want a "message", karuthu or naattuku nalladhu kind of story. All that I look for is, when a director makes a movie, he has to have something in his mind which he wants to convey to the audience - some concept or a feeling or some emotion which he wishes to express.

    On a different note, I also like to be entertained and I am also open to masala, timepass movies. Contradictory, but what the hell, humans are by definition contradcitory!

    @ octotus : I agree with you that it was not one of my best posts. It was a more off-the-top-of-my-mind kinda post, so didn't bother about coherency. Started somewhere and went off in a different direction without a logical sequence.

    But i disagree with your statement: " it is not songs that make the movie unrealistic - it is the lack of coherence during the shift from a scene to a song that makes it often jarring."
    The very fact of having an actor sing a song extempore is going to be unrealistic unless there is a basis for the character to do so. Unless the actor is portrayed as a poet who can sing, the whole thing is unrealistic in itself. How many people do you know, who as soon as they feel something can come up with a song and fit it into a tune and sing it on the spot?
    But, I do agree with you that the lack of coherence in shifting from a scene to a song makes it more unrealistic. (Sadly, that is what is happening today :-( )

    ReplyDelete